Email sent to Gloria Santona, General Counsel of McDonald’s Corporation, requesting an update

2015-10-21
2 min read
Featured Image

From: Vincent B. Le Corre

Subject: update

Date sent:2015-10-21 22:45 +0800 (China Standard Time)

To: Gloria Santona <Gloria.Santona@us.mcd.com>

Cc: Steve Easterbrook <Steve.Easterbrook@us.mcd.com>

Ms. Santona,

I would like to give a friendly reminder that I gave McDonald’s a deadline of October 22nd 2015 midnight GMT time. So you have about 36 hours left. It was 4 entire days which is more than enough considering I’ve sent my first cease and desist letter back in 2012. On top of this, had I known that the French branch had started scamming people again, I would have at the time only given you 24 to 48 hours. On top of this it’s really a simple matter somehow : you’ve omitted to tell people the game was rigged.

Could you please let me know what’s going on right now and what you are doing to resolve this situation?

Also, I strongly suggest you not to wait an additional 36 hours to call off the fraud in France. This should be done at once. I’ve just checked your website in France and I see the scam is still displaying. Please let me know what’s going on.

Thank you.

Best regards,

[ Vincent B. Le Corre ]
Shanghai, October 21st 2015 22h45 Shanghai time

PS : a copy of this email is sent to Mr. Easterbrook

To gain a clearer understanding of the sequence of events in this case, I invite you to view a detailed timeline at the following link:
https://www.ECTHRwatch.org/timeline/mcdonalds/
This timeline provides a comprehensive overview of the key milestones and developments.

Avatar

Vincent B. Le Corre

I am the key witness and whistleblower in the major criminal RICO case targeting McDonald’s Corporation and their accomplices for fraud, money laundering, and corruption of foreign officials and magistrates. Initially granted anonymity by the European Court of Human Rights (Rules 33 and 47 of the Rules of Court), I made the decision in August 2023 to temporarily go public with my identity. This decision, driven by concerns for my own safety and that of my loved ones, was taken despite the potential risks, hoping it will be temporary only and that I can return to anonymity soon.